The Cleveland Zoo: Four Ways Out of the Fencing Problem

A zoo is not a banquet hall, as the venue says. It is also not a place a wide lens belongs.

The Cleveland Zoo is not a typical banquet hall or hotel ballroom, as its own description puts it — it is a place that offers a story and an unforgettable experience.

That is true and the photographic consequence of it is a single structural problem: mesh, bars, railings and safety barriers exist in every direction at a zoo and cannot be removed. The difficulty is not that they are ugly but that a wide lens keeps them sharp and legible, complete with the sign, the bin and the service door beside them.

What this particular zoo has in its favour is its setting. A zoo built into a wooded river valley has mature canopy, real topography and steep ground — which gives continuous shade, natural elevation, and long sight lines that flat zoo grounds do not. Those are the ways out of the fencing problem, and they are more reliable than technique alone.

This is written as the problem and four ways out of it. We have not photographed a wedding at the Cleveland Zoo; zoos behave consistently. Which locations a booking includes, whether the grounds can be private, and what the indoor fallback actually holds are the questions for their team — in this climate the last one matters in every month.

The Cleveland Zoo at a glance

Where	A wooded valley, Cleveland, Ohio
Character	A zoo in mature woodland with steep ground and event spaces
The problem	Fencing, mesh and railings in every direction
The ways out	Focal length, canopy, topography, and any glasshouse
Ask first	Locations included, private grounds, and what the fallback holds

The problem, precisely

Fencing is a focal length problem before it is anything else. At 35mm a barrier five metres behind a couple reads clearly as a fence, and the incidental objects beside it — signage, bins, service doors, hose reels — do more damage to a frame than the mesh itself.

Animals are the second condition and they behave as content rather than background, because human vision prioritises movement and faces. An animal visible behind a couple takes the eye every time, which is either the point of the frame or a distraction, with no useful middle position.

Glass viewing panels are the third: they reflect whatever is bright behind the camera, they are usually scratched, and they tint slightly. Shooting obliquely moves the reflected cone off the lens; a rubber hood pressed flat and shot perpendicular removes it entirely, but only for frames without people in them.

Other visitors are the fourth, and unless the grounds are private they are not avoidable at any hour a wedding happens. That is a question worth asking directly rather than assuming.

And the fifth is specific to a zoo in a valley: the ground is steep. That is mostly an asset, but it means distances that look short on a map are not, guest access to an upper or lower location is a real question, and where a group photograph can happen needs deciding in advance rather than discovering with thirty people standing on a slope.

Four ways out

The first way out is optical and it solves the fencing almost entirely. A long lens at a wide aperture, with the couple several metres in front of any barrier, turns mesh into an unreadable soft band — present in the frame but not legible as fencing. At 135mm or 200mm wide open, a barrier five metres back becomes texture rather than structure, and the sign and the bin go with it.

The corollary is that a wide lens near an enclosure is a mistake rather than a preference. If a frame seems to require one, it needs a different position instead.

The second way out is the canopy, and in a wooded valley zoo it is the strongest natural answer. Continuous deep shade under mature trees is soft, cool and directional towards any opening, and available for hours — which in a humid Ohio summer is the only condition where formal clothes and a long outdoor block are compatible. Locating the largest unbroken area of it on arrival is the most useful five minutes on the site.

Dapple is the corresponding hazard: hot spots several stops above the surrounding shadow across a face, shifting with every breath of wind, impossible to correct or predict. Full shade, open light, or wait for the sun to drop below the canopy. And green bounce from dense foliage throws green onto nearby skin — localised, so auto white balance cannot fix it, which means a custom white balance set on a face in the position being used and any pale path used as a neutral bounce.

The third way out is the topography, which flat zoos do not have. Slope gives natural elevation, so a camera can be genuinely above or below a subject without any architecture: shooting up a path puts a couple against canopy and sky, which is the cleanest background there is, and shooting down puts them against ground and planting, which is a uniform predictable tone. Both are useful and neither is available on level ground — and both frequently exclude fencing entirely, simply by pointing the camera where barriers are not.

The fourth way out is any glasshouse or indoor habitat building. A glasshouse under overcast is one of the best photographic environments there is — light arriving through the whole roof and both flanks, diffused twice, from everywhere at once with no hard edge — and in Cleveland, one of the cloudiest major cities in the country, that condition is the default for much of the year. Under direct sun the glazing bars print a lattice of hard shadow, so find the pockets under dense planting or use the pattern on a path rather than on a face.

Indoor habitat buildings are the other option and they carry the aquarium’s problems in miniature: warm, humid, dim, with glazed panels and strong colour. One gelled source at face height, exposed a stop under the room, and frames shot obliquely to any glass, covers it.

• Long lens, wide aperture, couple several metres clear of any barrier
• Never a wide lens near an enclosure; find a different position
• Find the largest continuous canopy shade before the middle of the day
• Use the slope: shooting up puts them against sky, down against ground
• A glasshouse under Cleveland overcast is the best light on the site

The hours, the fallback, and Cleveland's year

The last ninety minutes do two things at once at a zoo. Low raking light lights the couple while putting mesh and railings into shadow, which physically reduces how much the fencing matters; and it backlights foliage so the grounds read as planted rather than merely green. It is the window the whole schedule should protect.

Group photographs need a decided position rather than an improvised one, because zoo paths are narrow, enclosures interrupt rows and valley ground is rarely level. The candidates are usually a lawn, a level terrace or the front of a building — find the one that works and know it before it is needed.

The indoor fallback is the question to settle honestly, and in Cleveland it matters in every season rather than only in summer. Ask what it is, how many it holds, and by what time the call gets made — and note that a zoo’s indoor spaces may be habitat buildings with their own constraints rather than function rooms.

Cleveland’s weather is the most consequential fact for a zoo in this list. Persistent overcast through much of the late autumn, winter and spring — this is one of the cloudiest major cities in the country — is largely good news outdoors: it removes dapple entirely, gives soft even light wherever the canopy opens, and makes any glasshouse superb. The adjustments are the usual two: add half a stop to a stop for the bright grey sky, and bring shape back subtractively by placing people near dark planting rather than by adding a flash.

Summer is humid, which makes the canopy essential and the open paths difficult. Autumn is the best season: mature valley woodland gives genuine late-October colour, animals are often more active in cool weather than in heat, and the air is at its clearest.

Winter is the hard one. Days are short, with sunset in the middle of the afternoon in December, which compresses the whole outdoor window into a couple of hours — and bare planting opens sight lines, which makes fencing more visible rather than less. That is worth saying plainly to a couple considering a winter date at a zoo.

Lake-effect snow is localised, sudden and heavy in this region, and it is a logistics question for guests before it is a photographic one. It is also the best natural fill there is, lifting exactly the shadows a low sun carves while fooling a meter by about two stops — and snow covers paths and railings, which genuinely reduces the fencing problem for as long as it lasts. Snow in mature valley woodland is the best frame this site will give all year.

And a route that alternates between warm humid habitat buildings and cold outside air will fog a lens repeatedly, so plan the route to minimise crossings rather than accepting several.

More frames from The Cleveland Zoo

The Cleveland Zoo wedding photography: common questions

How do you deal with fencing?

Optically. A long lens at a wide aperture with the couple several metres clear of any barrier turns mesh into an unreadable soft band — and takes the sign and the bin with it.

What does a wooded valley add?

Continuous canopy shade, and topography. Slope gives elevation without architecture, so shooting up puts a couple against sky and shooting down puts them against ground — both of which exclude fencing.

Why avoid dappled light?

Because it puts hot spots several stops above the surrounding shadow across a face and shifts with every breeze, so it can neither be corrected nor predicted.

What is the best light on the site?

A glasshouse under overcast — light through the whole roof and both flanks, diffused twice, from everywhere at once. In Cleveland that condition is the default for much of the year.

Is winter good at a zoo?

Mixed. Days are short and bare planting opens sight lines, which makes fencing more visible. But snow covers paths and railings, and snow in valley woodland is the best frame the site gives.

What should the fallback question cover?

What it is, how many it holds, and when the call is made — and note that a zoo’s indoor spaces may be habitat buildings rather than function rooms, with their own constraints.

More Cleveland, OH venue guides

We are writing a photographer’s guide to every venue we would happily shoot in Cleveland, OH. Here are three more, plus the full index:

• The FirstEnergy Powerhouse, Cleveland: Field Notes on a Converted Power Station
• The Forest City Brewery, Cleveland: Field Notes on a Brewery Venue
• The Great Lakes Science Center, Cleveland: The One Decision That Governs Everything

All Cleveland, OH Wedding Venues →

Planning a wedding at The Cleveland Zoo?

A long lens, the canopy, the slope and a real fallback. Tell us your date.

Tell us about your day →  |  See recent work