Preloader

The Venetian, Garfield: The Building’s Own Logic

The Venetian, Garfield: The Building’s Own Logic


This building is not subtle and it is not trying to be. Photograph it on its own terms.

A grand spectacle venue has a logic as clear and internally consistent as any historic house, and it is worth reading on its own terms rather than judging against a different kind of building.

The logic is impression. Everything in such a place exists to produce a sense of occasion: scale that exceeds what is functionally needed, symmetry on every axis, ornament in quantity, materials that shine, and lighting designed to be looked at rather than to be unobtrusive.

Four consequences follow and they govern every frame in the building.

Scale means the architecture will dwarf a wedding unless it is used deliberately. A room built to feel impressive with two hundred people in it makes fifty look sparse, and a wide frame containing the volume shows a space rather than an event.

Symmetry means there is a correct camera position and a great many incorrect ones. Every axis in a building like this is deliberate — a staircase on centre, matching pilasters, a chandelier on the middle line, a symmetrical head table — which means a frame a degree off level or a metre off centre reads as a mistake rather than a style.

Ornament means the frame is full. Plasterwork, gilding, drapery, mouldings and fittings occupy every surface, which leaves no quiet ground for a subject to sit against — so separation has to be made rather than found, and composition has to be deliberate rather than approximate.

And reflection means the photographer is in the picture until they decide not to be. Mirrored panels, polished stone, glass and marble multiply everything, including whoever is holding the camera.

We have not photographed a wedding at the Venetian; grand spectacle venues behave consistently. Which rooms are included, whether the lighting can be dimmed or set for particular moments, whether more than one event runs on a date, what the actual timings are, and what daylight reaches the preparation rooms are questions for their team.

The Venetian at a glance

WhereA grand spectacle venue at Garfield, Bergen County
The logicImpression: scale, symmetry, ornament and reflection, all deliberate
ScaleIt dwarfs a wedding unless the frame is about the scale on purpose
SymmetryOne correct camera position; anything approximate reads as an error
Ask firstRooms included, lighting control, timings, other events that day

Scale and symmetry

The scale has to be either the subject of a frame or out of it, and the middle course is what produces the weak pictures.

Used as the subject, it is genuinely impressive. A very wide frame with a couple small and centred in an enormous ornate volume, square and level, is a strong picture precisely because it is about the disproportion — and it is what the building is for. One or two of those in a set is right.

Kept out of the frame, the pictures become about people. A longer lens at a wider aperture reduces the ornament to soft tone and colour, which removes the scale problem, the symmetry requirement and the reflection problem in one move — and puts the emphasis where a wedding’s interest actually is.

The middle course — a moderately wide frame containing part of the volume and a moderately sized couple — reads as neither, and it is the default that most pictures in these rooms fall into.

The staircase is the building’s most useful single position, as it is in any grand venue. It gives height without equipment, an architectural frame on both sides, a sightline from above and below, and a subject on a different level from everyone else, which separates them for free.

Two technical points on a ceremonial stair. The light almost always comes from above — a chandelier, a skylight or a high fitting — which lands on the top of a head and leaves the eyes dark, so a subject looking up the stair catches it and one looking down is in their own shadow. That one decision makes or breaks the frame. And the geometry is unforgiving: a stair is full of strong parallels, so square and level, checked rather than assumed.

The symmetry demands precision everywhere, not only on the stair. The habit worth building is to check level and centring before the first frame in any new position rather than relying on correcting it afterwards — because correcting a converging vertical costs resolution and crops the frame, and correcting a horizon by a degree crops it further.

Standing further back with a longer lens rather than tilting up from close in is the practical answer to convergence, and in a large room there is usually space to do it.

Height is the other way symmetry can be used well. Any balcony, mezzanine or upper landing looking down over a room makes an enormous volume legible as a shape rather than an expanse — and in a symmetrical building a view down the central axis from above is the strongest architectural frame available.

The ornament is worth one compositional note. A full frame has no negative space, which means the subject has to be separated by tone and light rather than by emptiness. Two positions do it reliably: in front of drapery, which is matte and dark and behaves like a stone wall; and in a doorway or arch with an unlit space behind, which gives two or three stops of separation for nothing.

Finding three or four of those before the day is ten minutes of work and it is what makes a varied set of pictures in a building where every wall is busy.

Couple small and centred in an enormous ornate volume
The subject, or out of frame.

Ornament, reflection, and the exposure

The exposure is where a building like this is won or lost, and the method is the reversal that applies to every ornate room in this guide.

Expose the ambient for the fittings rather than for the faces — deliberately a stop or a stop and a half under what skin needs — so chandeliers hold their crystal and their individual lamps rather than fusing to white, and so plasterwork, gilding and moulding keep the shadow that makes them read as three-dimensional.

Then add one source for the faces: off the camera axis, at about a stop above what the ambient gives the skin, gelled warm to match the room, and diffused so it does not read as flash. The white balance goes to the gel.

The instinct to raise sensitivity until the room looks bright is what produces the characteristic bad photograph of a spectacle venue: flat, uniformly gold, no depth, and every elaborate surface reduced to a texture-free wash. The reversal prevents it, and it is the single most important technical decision in the building.

Two constraints on the added light. A tall ornate ceiling is not a usable bounce surface, because a flash aimed five or six metres up returns almost nothing and what returns is coloured by whatever is painted or gilded there — a pale nearby wall usually works instead. And nothing in a large room bounces usefully, which means the light has to travel with the subject: a source at two metres needs roughly a quarter of the output of the same source at four.

Colour needs deciding rather than averaging. A room like this has warm fittings, cooler accent lighting and frequently coloured uplighting on the walls, all at once — and the rule is to set the white balance for whatever is landing on the skin and let the rest fall where it falls. Correct skin in a coloured room is a picture; skin rendered gold, pink or blue is not, and it is not recoverable.

Where the lighting changes through the evening, and at a venue with cues it will, the balance has to be checked again rather than set once.

The reflections are the last element of the logic and they are both hazard and resource. Every mirrored panel, polished floor and glass surface returns the room — and the photographer — to the camera whenever the camera is near perpendicular to it. A few degrees off, or a metre to one side, removes it entirely, and the habit is to check the background of the first frame in every position.

Used deliberately, they are the building’s best frames. A mirrored wall doubles a room and gives symmetry that nothing else provides. A polished floor doubles every figure and every light, which during a first dance is the strongest single frame these rooms produce — camera low, angle chosen, and the exposure set for the couple rather than for the reflection, which runs about a stop darker.

And a mirror-topped table or a glass fitting in the foreground of a wide room frame gives depth that the same frame without it does not have.

The rule across all of it is that a reflection deliberately composed reads as design and the same reflection accepted by accident reads as carelessness. The difference is thirty seconds of looking before the first frame.

Whether the house lighting can be dimmed and set is the most valuable question to ask in advance, because in a room whose whole character is its lighting, a venue that will configure it for the ceremony and the first dance is offering something no technique replaces.

The preparation rooms follow the ordinary rule: find the window, turn the room lights off, work a metre from the glass at forty-five degrees with a custom white balance set on the face. Where there is no window, one source through a modifier placed to one side with the room’s own light a stop under gives window-like light that stays consistent frame to frame.

  • Make the scale the subject or keep it out of frame — nothing in between
  • Square and level on the axis; symmetry punishes approximation
  • Expose the room a stop under, then one gelled source above skin
  • Drapery and dark doorways are the only quiet backgrounds; find them first
  • Compose reflections deliberately or remove them with a few degrees of angle
Ceremonial staircase shot square with light from above
Look up it, not down.

The Bergen County year

A grand spectacle venue is among the most weather-independent in this guide, which means the season affects the outdoor half of the day and the preparation-room light rather than whether anything works.

Winter is cold with snow in most years, and for a building like this it is close to irrelevant — the honest argument for a February date, and a strong one. Guests arrive under cover and the whole event happens inside.

Where winter helps is the daylight positions. The December sun at this latitude reaches only about twenty-six degrees above the horizon, which means it enters any window almost horizontally and travels much further into a room than a high summer sun does — so a preparation room with a window is better lit in January than in June, and the usable band beside the glass is much wider.

Winter’s other advantage is the early evening, and at a venue with an elaborate lit exterior it is a real one. Any after-dark frame with the building lit from within is available from mid-afternoon rather than after eight, which means it fits comfortably inside a normal running order — and a grand façade lit at night, doubled in wet paving, is the strongest exterior frame such a venue has.

Snow is the outdoor asset: the best natural fill available, lifting every shadow and throwing light upward into faces, and snow against an ornate dark façade gives the widest brightness range on the site. Expose for the snow and let the building go dark, overexposing deliberately relative to the meter, which snow fools by about two stops.

The costs are a short day, cold hands, batteries draining faster, and a cold camera fogging when carried from a winter forecourt into a heated mirrored interior — where both the body and the lens will mist. Spares in an inside pocket and bodies bagged until they warm.

Early spring is the weakest outdoor part of the year in this region: bare trees, grey ground and wet footing. Indoors it makes no difference at all, which at a venue built entirely around its interiors is no loss and a legitimate reason to weight an April wedding inward.

Late spring is mild and green, with planting softening the exterior frames through May. The complication is the long days: in June the good low light arrives after eight in the evening, which at a venue with fixed timings means the best exterior light falls after the reception has started. Worth negotiating in advance rather than regretting.

Summer is hot and humid — commonly upper eighties Fahrenheit and above with high humidity — with afternoon thunderstorms a real feature from June into August. Indoors none of that matters; outdoors the middle of the day belongs to the porte-cochère and any solid-roofed structure rather than to open ground.

The humidity also reduces the definition on an ornate exterior, which is the opposite of what elaborate architecture wants — relief needs clear air and raking light to read.

Autumn is the best season for the outdoor half and the most convenient for a scheduled venue. The humidity breaks in September, the air reaches its clearest of the year — restoring the definition on every ornamental surface — and foliage in Bergen County peaks from the middle of October into early November, over two or three weeks because the species turn at different rates.

The scheduling advantage is that the days are short enough for the good light to fall inside a normal afternoon slot rather than hours after it. And for a building whose interiors are gold, mirrored and artificial, twenty minutes outdoors in clean autumn daylight gives the finished set of pictures a consistency and a season that nothing inside can.

Ballroom exposed a stop under with chandeliers holding their crystal
Then one gelled source.

More frames from The Venetian

Subject against drapery in an otherwise busy room
The only easy separation here.
Couple doubled in a polished floor with lighting reflected around them
The strongest frame in the building.

The Venetian wedding photography: common questions

What is the building's logic?

Impression — scale, symmetry, ornament and reflection, all deliberate. It is not trying to be subtle, and it photographs best on its own terms.

How do I handle the scale?

Make it the subject of one or two frames — a couple small and centred in the volume — and keep it out of the rest with a longer lens.

Why does symmetry matter so much?

Every axis is deliberate, so a frame a degree off level or a metre off centre reads as a mistake. Check before the first frame, not afterwards.

How is the room exposed?

A stop or a stop and a half under what skin needs, so the fittings hold their structure, then one gelled source above skin level for the faces.

Where are the quiet backgrounds?

Drapery, which behaves like dark stone, and any doorway or arch with an unlit space behind it. Find three or four before the day.

What about the reflections?

Compose them deliberately or remove them with a few degrees of angle. A reflection by accident reads as carelessness; on purpose it reads as design.

More New Jersey venue guides

We are writing a photographer’s guide to every venue we would happily shoot in New Jersey. Here are three more, plus the full index:

All New Jersey →

Planning a wedding at The Venetian?

A building on its own terms. Tell us your date and we will photograph it that way.

Tell us about your day →  |  See recent work

Leave a comment

TOP